That makes a huge difference because you would have to index every coordinates of each point separately.īesides, you can also use geodist() as is with the BBoxField field type that indexes a single rectangle per document field and supports searching via a bounding box. It would require 2 indexed fields (or values per field at least) for 2 dimensions, 3 for 3d, and so on. In order to perform the same spatial search, you would have to specify every point's dimension separately. In geodist (sfield, x, y), sfield is a spatial field type that represents two points (lat,lon), so the direct equivalent using dist() would be to implement dist (2, sfieldX, sfieldY, x, y) with sfieldX and sfieldY being respectively the (lat,lon) coordinates of sfield. BBoxField (for areas, 4 instances of another field type referred to by numberType).SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType (RPT for short), including RptWithGeometrySpatialField, a derivative.LatLonType (now deprecated) and its non-geodetic twin PointType.Four main field types are available for spatial search : Behind the scenes, latitude and longitude are indexed as separate numbers. This field type is strictly limited to coordinates in lat/lon decimal degrees. Most spatial implementation are based on Lucene's Points API, which is a BKD Index. Ansible recommends writing logs to secure location in case it contains sensitive data.The main difference is that geodist() is intended to work with spatial field types. Loop: ""Īs for now it seems there is no way to implement desired behavior w/o workarounds. You can register output of no_log task and print only non-secret part in subsequent debug: - hosts: localhost There is a way to achieve desired behavior in multuple tasks with ansible's error handling.
I will weigh the pros and cons to see if I will implement this workaround, or if I continue to use it the way it is now. That said, I asked for a solution, and based on how Ansible works at the moment, the provided workaround (or some similar workaround) seems to be the only way to achieve what I asked. So the best I could say, is that this is a workaround that solves a problem and creates several others. Changing and testing the existing loop tasks, as well as making any new loops follow this format, will be a maintenance burden (especially because of point 2, that makes me think if I'm actually improving the code, or making it worse).The 2 tasks will be printed unnecessarily when everything is fine (with success messages printed separately from the actual tasks, making the output worse when everything runs successfully, which should be most cases).The loop label in the debug task will be different than the one in the main loop task (which may make it more difficult to associate success and error cases to the actual items).The error and where it shows the error message will be different places.If you have a loop in a parent file, you should use loop_control with loop_var in the debug loop.
#Geodist dont print code#
#Geodist dont print install#
You have to install the library jmespath prior to running json_query filter.The answer from Vladimir actually works as a workaround, but there are several downsides in using it: So, is there a way to make it not log the loop items when an error occurs, but log everything else? It could be either a task flag, just like no_log, or some global configuration, to include in the ansible.cfg file. This is similar to stop all logs in a reverse proxy, or log everything, including authorization headers, both of which are far from desired in a production environment. I can hide it using no_log: true, but it then hides everything, including when a sucess happens, as well as the error message, that could be perfectly fine, and making me clueless about the actual error when I don't see it. When I execute an ansible module with a loop that has dictionaries with values to be used by the module, including confidential information, I can hide it using loop_control.label, but not when an error happens.
0 kommentar(er)
